Optimizing targeted conservation for disproportionate benefits

Author(s): Ellen Audia, Lisa Schulte Moore, John Tyndall
Abstract:

The U.S. Corn Belt is highly productive with respect to agricultural outcomes, but has unintended negative impacts on the water quality and biodiversity. Perennial conservation practices provide multiple benefits that can effectively mitigate many environmental challenges when strategically integrated within agricultural landscapes. Many conservationists and land use planners are turning to spatially targeted conservation, which can help conservation partners focus time and resources on the most vulnerable areas and plan for the joint alignment of environmental and economic outcomes. Our objective was to demonstrate a methodology for optimizing the placement of perennial conservation practices—including prairie strips, riparian buffers, and nutrient-removal wetlands—across agricultural landscapes.
We sought to cost-effectively maximize multiple environmental outcomes and understand the economic impacts of optimal conservation practice adoption in East Big Creek watershed, located in central Iowa. We used open source data and tools to inform the placement of perennial conservation practices and maximize watershed scale water quality (nitrate-nitrogen reduction) and biodiversity across a range of conservation practice annual cost constraints, and determined the regional economic impact of optimal conservation practice adoption. The optimization algorithm revealed landscape configurations that met the range of budget constraints. Reduction in watershed-level nitrate-nitrogen loss by 14% and improvements to biodiversity by 54% can be achieved by shifting as little as 1.3% of agricultural land use when perennial conservation practices were strategically chosen and placed. The initial establishment of perennial conservation practices generated substantial additional economic activity in comparison to the status quo, including the addition of $932-$5,550,000 in total agricultural-related industrial output, $447-$3,100,000 in total value added, $310-$2,400,000 in total labor income, and up to 42 jobs. Few studies have incorporated spatial optimization of conservation practice placement and also determined the overall economic impacts of alternative landscape configuration. Our study demonstrates a methodology that can be incorporated into planning tools to inform cost-effective multi-objective conservation action.

Funder: Iowa State University Presidential Interdisciplinary Research Initiative
Award Title:
Vice President of Research Presidential Interdisciplinary Research Initiative for the Consortium for Cultivating Human And Naturally reGenerative Enterprises
Award Number: PG110214
Keywords:
agricultural conservation, agriculture, biodiversity, economic, ecosystem services, nutrient retention wetland, prairie strip, riparian buffer, spatially targeted, water quality
Project (Abbreviated name):
G2G_Schulte_optimizing_targeted_conservation
Team: Grass2Gas
Geographic Location:
East Big Creek watershed
Data Table Column Names and Descriptions
Table NameColumn NameData TypeUnitsColumn Description
data.contour_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetcontour buffer strip enterprise budget pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.contour_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetcost activities or itemsstringNAThe activity or item that is accruing cost.
data.contour_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetmean price per acrestringNAThe average cost of the activity in US dollars per acre.
data.contour_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetnotesstringNAExtra information for each activity.
data.contour_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetrange of costs unitsstringNAThe range of costs/unit of each activity.
data.contour_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetyear cost incurredstringNAThe year the cost is expected to accrue.
data.contour_buffer_strip_impact_summarycontour buffer strip impact summary pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.contour_buffer_strip_impact_summaryemploymentfloatnumberThe number of jobs the addition of nutrient retention wetlands creates.
data.contour_buffer_strip_impact_summaryimpact typestringNAThe type of economic impact (e.g., direct, indirect, etc).
data.contour_buffer_strip_impact_summarylabor incomefloatNAThe income generated from establishing the best management practice.
data.contour_buffer_strip_impact_summaryoutputfloatNAThis is what is produced annually in the industries being evaluated.
data.contour_buffer_strip_impact_summarytotal value addedfloatNAValue added is composed of wages and salaries to workers, returns to management to sole proprietors, incomes from properties and other investments, and indirect tax payments that are part of the industrial production processes. Value added is the same thing as Gross Regional Product.
data.contour_buffer_strip_species_listcontour buffer strip species list pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.contour_buffer_strip_species_listspeciesstringNAThe species present in the best management practice.
data.contour_buffer_strip_species_listtypestringNABroad functional group of plant species.
data.healthy_farm_index_target_and_weight_valuescategorystringNAThe Healthy Farm Index category of the measure.
data.healthy_farm_index_target_and_weight_valueshealthy farm index target and weight values pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.healthy_farm_index_target_and_weight_valuesmeasurestringNAThe type of ecosystem measurement.
data.healthy_farm_index_target_and_weight_valuestargetfloatNAThe target value for each measure.
data.healthy_farm_index_target_and_weight_valuesweight1floatNAHow much weight for each measure in first HFI calculation. Weights should sum to 1.0.
data.healthy_farm_index_target_and_weight_valuesweight2floatNAHow much weight for each measure in second HFI calculation. Numbers should sum to 1.0.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetcost activities or itemsstringNAThe activity or item that is accruing cost.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetdata sourcestringNAThe source of the cost information.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetmean price per acrestringNAThe average cost of the activity in US dollars per acre.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetnotesstringNAExtra information for each activity.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetnutrient retention wetland enterprise budget pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetrange of costs unitsstringNAThe range of costs of the activity in US dollars per acre.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_enterprise_budgetyear cost incurredstringNAThe year the cost is expected to accrue.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_impact_summaryemploymentfloatnumberThe number of jobs the addition of nutrient retention wetlands creates.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_impact_summaryimpact typestringNAThe type of economic impact (e.g., direct, indirect, etc).
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_impact_summarylabor incomefloatNAThe income generated from establishing the best management practice.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_impact_summarynutrient retention wetland impact summary pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_impact_summaryoutputfloatNAThis is what is produced annually in the industries being evaluated.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_impact_summarytotal value addedfloatNAComposed of wages and salaries to workers, returns to management to sole proprietors, incomes from properties and other investments, and indirect tax payments that are part of the industrial production processes. Value added is the same thing as Gross Regional Product
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_species_listnutrient retention wetland species list pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_species_listspeciesstringNAThe species present in the best management practice.
data.nutrient_retention_wetland_species_listtypestringNAType of species (e.g., forb, grass).
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetcost activities or itemsstringNAThe activity or item that is accruing cost.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetdata sourcestringNAThe source of the cost information.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetmean price per acrestringNAThe average cost of the activity in US dollars per acre.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetnotesstringNAExtra information for each activity.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetrange of costs unitsstringNAThe range of costs/unit of each activity.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetriparian buffer strip enterprise budget pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_enterprise_budgetyear cost incurredstringNAThe year the cost is expected to accrue.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_impact_summaryemploymentfloatnumberThe number of jobs the addition of the riparian buffer strip creates.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_impact_summaryimpact typestringNAThe type of economic impact (e.g., direct, indirect, etc).
data.riparian_buffer_strip_impact_summarylabor incomefloatNAThe income generated from establishing the best management practice.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_impact_summaryoutputfloatNAThis is what is produced annually in the industries being evaluated.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_impact_summaryriparian buffer strip impact summary pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_impact_summarytotal value addedfloatNAValue added is composed of wages and salaries to workers, returns to management to sole proprietors, incomes from properties and other investments, and indirect tax payments that are part of the industrial production processes. Value added is the same thing as Gross Regional Product.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_species_listriparian buffer strip species list pkeyfloatnumberA unique primary key for this table.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_species_listspeciesstringNAThe species present in the best management practice.
data.riparian_buffer_strip_species_listtypestringNAType of species (e.g., forb, grass).